Search

Kim Foote

Woodinville, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
45 matches · 13W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Woodinville · 3.5
12 of 13
WA · 3.5
958 of 1209

Kim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 31st to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.7% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.2% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.8% of games
8.0mixed
6.7%
1W–14L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leilani de Jong
0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Suzanne Vogt / J Coifman
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Atkinson
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Bradley
0.003about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Nita Khandelwal / Tammy Chu
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Smaranda Lieuallen
0.086below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Sia
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sharon Jaeger / Rebecca Fausel
2022-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
+0.012about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Mary King / Kathy McCann
2022-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Sia
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2022-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lili Gong
+0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Ayiesha Selwanes / Karen Schmid
2022-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roopa Satagopan
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2021-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vijay Sankaran
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.