Search

Carolyn Atkinson

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
170 matches · 87W–83L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.0
76%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.5
35 of 35
WA · 3.5
1163 of 1209

Carolyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carolyn has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Carolyn has gone from the 50th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
58.8%
40W–28L · 53.6% of games
3.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 44.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.1% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 30.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Vail
0.040below expectation — took 0% of games against 31% expected
1-0
L
Ale Jimenez / Nicole Ballas
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Boyle
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tomoe Tawara
0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Suzanne Vogt / J Coifman
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Foote
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Vail
+0.042better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Shan Zhu / Xiaoyi Ye
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammi Tompkins
+0.004about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jena Wahl / Melissa Stratman
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Vail
+0.008about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Vail
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tomoe Tawara
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tanya Vail
+0.053better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Braza
+0.030better than expected — took 60% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Erica Wiechers / Kitrina Bryant
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Camille Elliott
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.