Search

Suzanne Vogt

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
171 matches · 83W–88L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
93 of 256
WA · 3.5
400 of 1209

Suzanne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Suzanne has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Suzanne has gone from the 47th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.9% of games
3.5
44.7%
38W–47L · 48.4% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history171 matches
W
Kimberly Lambert / Rachel Smith
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Berger
+0.060better than expected — took 62% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Coifman
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Coe
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Paul Yi / Shanna Chuachamps
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Liao
0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Liao
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Joshua Bradshaw / Ginny Nguyenchamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Hiromichi Yamamoto
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Ian Platou / Alyssa Fitzgeraldchamps
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Hiromichi Yamamoto
+0.016better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Alexis Chen / Janine Sy
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Stroh
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chaz Pangelinan
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramanuja Atur
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Tanja Omeze / Cheryl Borgonia
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Berger
0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaitlyn Casimo
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.