← Search

Kimberly Lambert

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 120W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Lambert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-08-30 · KL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · KL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-08-09 · Dutch One Dubs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marian Joh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Liu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-03 · Dutch One Dubs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lexie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-31 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · 3.5 Four Hands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Dutch One Dubs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Elling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · 3.5 Four Hands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marian Joh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bally Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with David Truong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Liu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
67.7%
42W–20L · 58.7% of games
4.0
41.3%
26W–37L · 44.3% of games
4.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 35.1% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
20W–14L · 58.4% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
26 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer