← Search

Mina Park

Federal Way, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 79W–55L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Mina Park to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-04 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Net Work Buddies-Park · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Net Work Buddies-Park · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Beagan Nguy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Net Work Buddies-Park · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Grace Zheng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Net Work Buddies-Park · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Kevin Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Nicole Costales / Tana Harris
2026-06-26 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Jurassic PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · WSC-DreamTeam-Sofranek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Zheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · WSC-DreamTeam-Sofranek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.5% of games
4.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.9% of games
0.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.3% of games
4.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 46.3% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#1 Female Doubles
27%
36 matches
#1 Female Singles
13%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams