Search

Lisa C

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 48W–53L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 49 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
4%
stay 3.0
96%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 38% stay · 62% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Lower than today’s 3.14 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
3 of 17
WA · 3.0
57 of 755

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lisa has gone from the 80th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 58.3% of games
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 45.7% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Amgalan Danjuur / Undariya Sukhbatmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Tran
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Jessmin Lau / Nikki Ryu Kitagaito
2026-07-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Polina Odintseva
0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4
W
Jing Li / Zhe Wangmixed
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Tran
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Mina Park / Laura Tran
2026-07-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Polina Odintseva
+0.020about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3
W
Annabella Chiocco / Jason Schroedermixed
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Tran
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-3
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dustin Schmidt
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
Bofan Hsu / Jenni Claymixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with DHARAM PATULE
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DHARAM PATULE
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zeran Wang
+0.064better than expected — took 63% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Alina Stanciu / Shanti Thapa
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Jenni Clay / Sarah Bierlink
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuni Kwon
0.048below expectation — took 38% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Katie Jergens / Hien Nguyen
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
+0.011about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.