← Search

Donna Kim

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 139W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Donna Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Terrence Seet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Terrence Seet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terrence Seet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terrence Seet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · Kimchi Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mabel Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Hinojosa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Kimchi Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mabel Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · Kimchi Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adrian Seet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · MC-MX 6.0-White · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Senthil Kumar Muthu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Munish Vashist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Lucy Zhang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 56.4% of games
3.5
67.1%
47W–23L · 56.7% of games
4.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.3% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 16.7% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.1%
27W–8L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe