← Search

Mabel Tang

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 132W–45L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mabel Tang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-08 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Hinojosa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-27 · Kimchi Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Kimchi Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terrence Seet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Ginny Larsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-05 · WSC-Larsen/Buck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · WSC-Larsen/Buck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · WSC-Larsen/Buck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Savitha Krammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-01 · WSC-Larsen/Buck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · MC-Spice Gals-Kim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · MC-Spice Gals-Kim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Min Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-17 · MC-Spice Gals-Kim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.3% of games
3.0
87.8%
43W–6L · 70.8% of games
3.5
68.4%
26W–12L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#1 Singles
12%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King