← Search

Sunita Shastri

ISSAQUAH, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
81 matches · 29W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
66%
down to 3.0
34%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 41% down · 59% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Higher than today’s 2.97 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
1203 of 1209

Sunita is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sunita has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sunita has gone from the 17th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.3% of games
3.5
25%
9W–27L · 41.8% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yogita MANGHNANI
−0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Barnes
−0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eden Goldbloom
−0.052below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Sandy Margoles / Karen Dalton
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monika Sharma
−0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Courtney Williams / Katie Misiewiczchamps
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Haag
+0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roopa Satagopan
−0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Janine Perret / Jennie Warrenchamps
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Shannen Wyman
−0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · with Shannen Wyman
−0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Sarah Zuberec / Kathy Schmid
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Chang
+0.041better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Soo Chin / Janet Chee
2026-01-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannen Wyman
−0.042below expectation — took 40% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Michelle Clark / Soo Chin
2026-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Barnes
+0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.