← Search

Sandy Margoles

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 29W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sandy Margoles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-26 · SCM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-4
L
2026-07-19 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vivek Sharma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Golphenee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · SCM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · TCSP-Margoles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Margoles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · TCSP-Margoles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelyn Regala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Margoles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Margoles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rana Muminoglu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · TCSP-Margoles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelyn Regala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · TCSP-Margoles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Mondau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.5% of games
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 52.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert