← Search

Ross Bunker

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 112W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ross Bunker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
L
2026-08-01 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Grant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · Bubunker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
L
2026-07-13 · Bubunker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Byrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elise Spencer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Honey Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · Bubunker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Byrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-12 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Hardie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bates McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · TUK-Au-Yeung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rizwan Ahmed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · TUK-Au-Yeung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Au-Yeung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
W
2026-05-02 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Robinet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Richard Crocker
2026-04-18 · RBunker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.5%
55W–39L · 55.5% of games
3.5
33.9%
21W–41L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
47 matches
#1 Singles
17%
37 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova