Search

Joe Zhou

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 70W–33L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
19%
stay 3.0
81%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 65% stay · 35% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
14 of 63
WA · 3.0
145 of 755

Joe is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joe has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Joe has gone from the 84th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 58.9% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ying-Fang Lai
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Alexandra Ryan / Rakesh Mallelamixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Richter
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Elia Bishara / James Harveychamps
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Ji Zhang
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Rizwan Ahmed / Ross Bunker
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ji Zhang
0.031below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zhikai Cui
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Tom Pigott / Patrick Brem
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ji Zhang
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Quinn Zakahi / Harold Wu
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tian Ouyang
+0.042better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Jason Holm / Gil White
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Davis Feng
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Fu
0.022below expectation — took 53% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Shahid Rashid / Keith Wong
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Fu
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Sameer Karnik / Vijay Gosalia
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Davis Feng
0.053below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Joseph Lampitt / Mark Braseth
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Davis Feng
+0.013better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.