← Search

Jason Holm

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 27W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Holm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-08-09 · BC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Holm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-07-11 · BC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Holm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-10 · BC-Lin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with C Todd Rentschler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · BC-Lin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · BC-Lin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gil White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · BC-Lin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · BC-Lin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with C Todd Rentschler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Raj Rajasekar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Yixiang Wang / Sam Liu
2025-05-31 · BC-Lin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with C Todd Rentschler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-11 · BC-Lin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raj Rajasekar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-05-10 · BC-Mann · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-03 · BC-Lin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raj Rajasekar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.8% of games
3.5
26.5%
9W–25L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal