Teams

BC-Lin

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs MC-3.0 Bad Doggies v6-TurnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesThane Liffick / C Todd Rentschler vs David Ou / RICKY WIJAYA1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShan Park / David Robinson vs Patrick Lawrence / Sundar Ganesh Natarajan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGary Fowler / Jason Holm vs Vijay Byndoor / Mike Gilkey5-7, 1-6
2026-03-07vs TCSP-Volley Llamas-TrattWon 30
W#1 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Gary Fowler vs Howard Willson / Jamil Rich2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraighton Goeppele / Thane Liffick vs James Williams / Ted Kalmus7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Wilkinson / Joseph Walowski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs NTC-Ball Machine-St De LoreLost 12
W#1 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Andy Carpinito vs Jef St de Lore / Phat Dinh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Wilkinson / Shan Park vs Chen Hsu / James Barrett5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Lin / Gary Fowler vs Scott Miller / Richard Seges5-7, 0-6
2026-02-15vs NWW-STC-WoodLost 04
L#1 DoublesJason Holm / C Todd Rentschler vs Chris Jones / Rob Hendry2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAndy Carpinito vs Bradley Delahunty2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Lin / Gary Fowler vs PORTER STROBLE / Ian Davis1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Robinson / Thomas Wilkinson vs MIke Wood / Grahm Satterwhite1-6, 1-6
2026-01-23vs RBW-Long Shots-FerreLost 04
L#1 DoublesAndy Carpinito / C Todd Rentschler vs Tim Flood / Michael Best3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCraighton Goeppele vs George Ilvanakis1-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesShan Park / Steve Lin vs Eddy Ferre / Yogesh Bedwal6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Claeys / Gary Fowler vs Yusuke Homma / Dhiraj Madan3-6, 4-6
2026-01-16vs AYTC-Tennis St(D)uds-OsbornWon 31
W#1 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Craighton Goeppele vs Kenneth Kodama / Felix Acuna6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShan Park vs Gary Western3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Claeys / Thomas Wilkinson vs Charles Moure / Rusty Warnock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Robinson / Gary Fowler vs Jerry Osborn / Ta-Chih Kao3-6, 2-6
2026-01-10vs ETC-Box 3.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Lin / Gary Fowler vs Mac Pinski / Michael Gauthier2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Andy Carpinito vs Philip Chan / Changsung Moon7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShan Park / David Robinson vs Barry Chu / Utsav Prabhu6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-03vs CAC/SL-TieBreakers-SinghLost 13
W#1 DoublesAndy Carpinito / C Todd Rentschler vs Mark Seko / Ed Ducheane6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCraighton Goeppele vs arvind Mallikarjunan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Brown / David Robinson vs Douglas Gordon / Sai Muppa1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesThomas Wilkinson / Joseph Walowski vs Gurmit Singh / Chitradeep Barman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Thane Liffick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
David Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Craighton Goeppele
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Shan Park
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
C Todd Rentschler
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.67
Andy Carpinito
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Jason Holm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Aaron Cahoon
published 3
2.51
Gary Fowler
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.50
Steve Lin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Thomas Wilkinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Keith Claeys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thane Liffick + Craighton Goeppele3351% games−3.6% vs expected
Keith Claeys + Thomas Wilkinson4151% gamesnot enough data
Keith Claeys + David Robinson224 matchesnot enough data
Keith Claeys + Steve Lin044 matchesnot enough data
C Todd Rentschler + Jason Holm224 matchesnot enough data
C Todd Rentschler + Craighton Goeppele224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Fowler + Steve Lin134 matchesnot enough data
David Robinson + Shan Park224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Thane Liffick
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
David Robinson
63W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Craighton Goeppele
20W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Shan Park
19W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
C Todd Rentschler
24W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Andy Carpinito
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Jason Holm
27W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Aaron Cahoon
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Gary Fowler
23W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Steve Lin
45W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Thomas Wilkinson
24W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Keith Claeys
23W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.