Search

David Robinson

HUNTS POINT, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
127 matches · 63W–64L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
51%
stay 3.0
49%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 85% stay · 15% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.00 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
255 of 755

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, David has gone from the 23rd to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
52.5%
31W–28L · 52.4% of games
6.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jordan
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Frank Weathers / Bob Wyda
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.047better than expected — took 43% of games against 28% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
David Bradlee / Howard Choder
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Mark West / Geoff Lieberman
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Daniel Martin / Douglas Mclennan
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Abhishek Singh / Matthew Campbell
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shan Park
+0.007about as expected — took 58% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
AL King / Kim Henderson
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Manning
+0.046better than expected — took 41% of games against 27% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Kim Gould / Regis Thevenet
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clifford Weiss
+0.015better than expected — took 69% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 5-2
L
Jerry Isen / Craig Lundgren
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Tursa
+0.020better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Quinn Zakahi / Zhengyang Deng
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gil White
0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
James Choi / Nicholas Sherman
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Wilkinson
0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Holm
+0.034better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.