← Search

David Robinson

HUNTS POINT, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 63W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Robinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-12 · BC-Clemente · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · BC-Clemente · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · BC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · BC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · BC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · BC-Lin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shan Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · BC-Clemente · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · BC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clifford Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
L
2026-04-21 · BC-Clemente · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Tursa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · BC-Lin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gil White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-15 · BC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · BC-Lin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
52.5%
31W–28L · 52.4% of games
6.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams