← Search

Tyler Fuller

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 61W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tyler Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eunji Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eunji Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · HBSQ-Furman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eunji Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eunji Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Tjoa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Bussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lindburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-01-30 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chuck Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ra'Id Khalil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.7%
44W–38L · 52.3% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.9% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#2 Singles
14%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova