← Search

Neil Price

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
72 matches · 32W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.5
26 of 35
WA · 3.5
689 of 1209

Neil is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Neil has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Neil has gone from the 18th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
46.2%
18W–21L · 47.6% of games
7.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Weathers
−0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Weathers
−0.017about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
James Hornsby / Jianqing Zhao
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Weathers
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Galen Wickstrom
−0.043below expectation — took 35% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Michael Ford / Peter Claassen
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Weathers
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Cameron Hykes / Steve Mattox
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Weathers
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
−0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Kenneth Burns / Colin Williams
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Hammer
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
+0.073better than expected — took 71% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Douglas Beck / Everett Seven
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
+0.016better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pawitri Price
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pawitri Price
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.