← Search

Frank Hammer

Mill Creek, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 54W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frank Hammer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Stuart Cobb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · NWW-MC-Sato · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Weathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-14 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · NWW-MC-Sato · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · NWW-MC-Sato · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · MC-3.5 Wolfpack-Hinojosa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-18 · MC-3.5 Wolfpack-Hinojosa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-10 · MC-3.5 Wolfpack-Hinojosa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Wajerski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · MC-Sato · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-16 · MC-Sato · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alvin Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.7% of games
4.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 55.8% of games
8.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal