Search

Daniel Wajerski

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
119 matches · 80W–39L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
45 of 96
WA · 3.5
617 of 1209

Daniel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Daniel has gone from the 52nd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
80.5%
33W–8L · 60.9% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.5% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
L
Jennifer Howe / Julian Webermixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Graves
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Mona Elsing / Richard Golpheneemixed
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Chu
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Nicolas Ludmer / Bryan Liu
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tipu Qureshi
+0.027better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Weiping Zhang / Joshua Shin
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Chung
+0.028about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Todd Seneker / Charlie Hsu
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Chung
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Remi Dargent / Jack Hanskat
2026-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Seet
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Chen Hsu / Luis Chacon
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Seet
0.012about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Percy Pan / Daifu Ye
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jyo Das
0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Santosh Lahankar
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mak Abulhosn / James Barberchamps
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Santosh Lahankar
0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Arun Thippur / Pramod Raghavendran
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Santosh Lahankar
+0.017better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
James Romano / Mark de Vere White
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Santosh Lahankar
+0.037better than expected — took 62% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.