← Search

James Barber

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 30W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Barber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-05-25 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · MI-Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Mak Abulhosn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · MI-Yetman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-08 · #2 Doubles · with Dirk Antonczyk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Dirk Antonczyk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-05-24 · MI-Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dirk Antonczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-18 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dirk Antonczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 53.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams