Search

Matthew Metz

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
128 matches · 86W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
147 of 256
WA · 3.5
619 of 1209

Matthew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Matthew has gone from the 46th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
57.9%
33W–24L · 53.7% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
7.0
88.9%
24W–3L · 70.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
W
J Coifman / Eric Lindburgmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Diaw
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Vivek Sharma / Sandy Margolesmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Howe
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Atreya Laxman / Ketil Freeman
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Lee
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Christopher Dickinson / James Barber
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Ehrlich
+0.013better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Chen Hsu / Luis Chacon
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Lee
0.028below expectation — took 55% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 4-4
L
Alan Pugh / Jason Young
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Odegard
0.031below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Ren Chung / Kevin Chung
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Ehrlich
0.042below expectation — took 40% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Stanley Barnes / Henry Targett
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Odegard
0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
CALVIN RUTHERFORD / Rich Choi
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Odegard
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Raju Gupta / Cameron Buck
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Hardie
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Hugo Aponte / Raghu Havaldar
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darrin Hansen
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
George Cheung / Henry Kiner
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Odegard
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.