← Search

J Coifman

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 18W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add J Coifman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Aaron Coe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Bally Bang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · Boring-without weak backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Lindburg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Boring-without weak backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bally Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · FC-In The Nick Of Time-Tchervenski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bally Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Boring-without weak backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Stroh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · TCSP-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-08 · TCSP-Slice Cream Sundaes-Tameling · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keli Faw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer