← Search

Stephanie Kung

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Kung to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-07 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Revere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-5
W
2026-04-25 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · #1 Female Doubles · with Jessmin Lau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
2026-02-27 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Kosiakova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
W
2026-02-15 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Kosiakova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2026-02-15 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #2 Mixed Doubles · 3.5 · with Wei Luk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6
W
2026-01-31 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Kosiakova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
2026-01-18 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessmin Lau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2026-01-10 · ETC-etras 3.5-Liang · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessmin Lau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
L
2025-12-13 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Liang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Liang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova