Search

Wolf Yeigh

Shoreline, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
272 matches · 176W–96L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
57%
stay 4.0
43%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.91. Lower than today’s 3.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Shoreline · 4.0
1 of 14
WA · 4.0
16 of 782

Wolf is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams72 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wolf has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Wolf has gone from the 90th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
68.1%
49W–23L · 57.3% of games
4.5
40%
18W–27L · 45.2% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
8.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 62.4% of games
9.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
72.1%
31W–12L · 59.6% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history272 matches
W
2026-07-26 · HBSQ-Ace Freely-Rutter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Racquel Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Rob Leinbach / Nancy Dalymixed
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Rutter/Bodine · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Rutter
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Harbor Hitters-Morrow · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Krystal Garfield
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Benjamin Tudor / Pam MacDuffmixed
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Harbor Hitters-Morrow · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.000below expectation — took 67% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Ace Freely-Rutter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Racquel Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · HBSQ-Harbor Hitters-Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · HBSQ-Rutter/Bodine · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colleen Sharkey
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · HBSQ-Ace Freely-Rutter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Racquel Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · HBSQ-Rutter/Bodine · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elissa Burke
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Alex Chen / Jared Hill
2026-06-07 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim McLean
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Harsha Gotur / Timothy Wu
2026-05-30 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim McLean
+0.039better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Carlos Ferreira / Tod Wescott
2026-05-24 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Efrem Zimbalist
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.