← Search

Colleen Sharkey

Centralia, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 142W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Colleen Sharkey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VAC-Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Hutchinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · GTC-Doane · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Duncan Sharkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · SWW-STAC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Florian Purganan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Duncan Sharkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · NWW-HBSQ-Rutter · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Falk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Duncan Sharkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Cedric Canton / Hong Vo
2026-07-11 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Duncan Sharkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Mary Guptill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams122 teams · 2004–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
70.1%
75W–32L · 58.9% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.3% of games
9.0
100%
5W–0L · 71.8% of games
8.0mixed
65.3%
32W–17L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
41.1%
23W–33L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer