Search

Tamra Godfrey

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
167 matches · 90W–77L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
81%
down to 4.0
19%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 55% down · 45% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.99. Higher than today’s 3.93 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
90 of 103
WA · 4.5
313 of 364

Tamra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tamra has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.0201920212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tamra has gone from the 93rd to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 61.5% of games
5.0
42.3%
22W–30L · 46.1% of games
10.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games
9.0mixed
48.5%
16W–17L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with J Michael Diaz
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Shannon Nelson / Laura Arakichamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Josh Pinyerd
0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
David Smith / Mayumi Barbermixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Lai
0.018about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Christine Yang
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jackie Vandenberg / Pablo Bernalmixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with J Michael Diaz
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hood
0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Neiley
0.014about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 2-3
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelsey King
+0.035better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Yang
+0.023better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.