Search

Laura Araki

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
128 matches · 95W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
59 of 186
WA · 4.0
240 of 782

Laura is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Laura has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Laura has gone from the 10th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
85.4%
35W–6L · 66.9% of games
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 61% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
L
Tiffany Hom / Elynn Wu
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Chen
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Shannon Nelson
+0.060better than expected — took 80% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Leah Hampton / Anthony Hamptonchamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Ryan Johnson
+0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Amy Cooley / Margot Linde
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicky Pan
0.028below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Chen
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Tana Harris / Shawli Hathaway
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Chen
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Debra Born / Melissa Stratman
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Ikeda
0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Chen
+0.031better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Erin Hostetler / Shyla Summers
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Ikeda
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-11 · #2 Doubles · with Harben Mahil
0.034below expectation — took 40% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/Amixed
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vineeth Omkaram
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Micah Thomas / Jena Wahlmixed
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Luu-Van
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.