Nancy Chan
Bellevue, WA
326 matches · 189W–137L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Nancy Chan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history326 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2021–2027
EDG-Kilambi
EDG-Mavericks-Gliner
EDG-Rittenhouse
EDG-Waltz
GTC-Kadoshima
Duece-a-drama
EDG-Hit & Run-Hei
EDG-Kilambi
EDG-Mavericks-Gliner
EDG-Mavericks-Gliner
EDG-Rittenhouse
EDG-The Young Once-Li
EDG-Volley Llamas-Debiec
GTC-Kadoshima/Nichols
JTC-Severns-Victorious Secret
NWW-EDG-Allen
NWW-EDG-Debiec
NWW-EDG-Dedmon
NWW-EDG-Wilson
NWW-HBSQ-Rutter
Slip Slop Smash
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 60.1% of games
4.0
71.2%
94W–38L · 58.6% of games
4.5
35.3%
12W–22L · 44.5% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.1% of games
8.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 69.4% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 73.2% of games
7.0mixed
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
32.6%
15W–31L · 42.8% of games
9.0mixed
13.3%
2W–13L · 41.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
123 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#1 Singles
17%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
55 matches
#2 Singles
4%
12 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.