← Search

Nancy Chan

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
317 matches · 186W–131L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 52 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 4.0
12 of 76
WA · 4.0
120 of 782

Nancy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nancy has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Nancy has gone from the 9th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 60.1% of games
4.0
69.8%
88W–38L · 58.6% of games
4.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 46.4% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.1% of games
8.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 69.4% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 73.2% of games
7.0mixed
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
34.1%
15W–29L · 43.4% of games
9.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history317 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Andry
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ildi Koves
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Tiffany Hom / Elynn Wu
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ildi Koves
−0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ildi Koves
+0.034better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ildi Koves
−0.017below expectation — took 57% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Kenneth Newton / Cristina Podluskymixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Kempf
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Tjelle
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Robertson
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Noriko Kilambi
+0.030better than expected — took 61% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Ildi Koves
+0.008better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Hei
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aaron Horton
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.