Search

Jenny Schell

Edmonds, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 44W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 4.0
2 of 9
WA · 4.0
133 of 782

Jenny is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jenny has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jenny has gone from the 80th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
63.8%
30W–17L · 56.8% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 51.4% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.9% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Footie Davis
+0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Karolina Simons / Barry Liebermanmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Philip Ansdell
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Footie Davis
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Rachel Smith / Lacey O'Connell
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Footie Davis
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Philip Ansdell
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
CECI BISSONNETTE / Nick LeClercqmixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bangwei Ma
+0.000below expectation — took 54% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Footie Davis
0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Brenda Nulty / Gayle Larsenchamps
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Footie Davis
+0.018better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Aline Pereira / NIKHIL PARSImixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Harriman
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Footie Davis
0.009about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cooley
0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Yan Hong / Jessie Song
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cooley
0.018below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.