Teams

CP-McRae

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs NTC-Shake and Bake-BlumWon 31
W#1 DoublesGenevieve Warren / Lana Hansen vs Monica Blum / Kim Hsu6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAika Yoshida vs Lyndia Brumback2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargot Linde / Amy Cooley vs Megan Johnson / Robin Freedman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kalman / Lori Aagard vs Pam MacDuff / Kirsten Graham6-4, 6-1
2026-03-01vs BC-LandryWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenny Schell / Joanna Bengford vs Cindy Goetzmann / Katrina Fleming6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Roush / Lisa Colter vs Dana Landry / Claudia Huzar6-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesLana Hansen / Ronni Fields vs Lisa Fleischman / Stacy King6-1, 6-4
2026-02-28vs TCSP-McCoyWon 40
W#1 DoublesJenny Schell / Lana Hansen vs Mary Ogborn / Deven McCoy6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGenevieve Warren vs Jennifer Zell5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargot Linde / Amy Cooley vs Nancy Knoll / Staci Foster6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Pappano / Jennifer Kalman vs SEVIL TOKSU / Lori Moriarty7-5, 6-4
2026-02-22vs STC-RoddenWon 40
W#1 DoublesFootie Davis / Jenny Schell vs Heidi Scalzo / Bridget Rodden7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLori Aagard vs Genevieve Morton6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Colter / Ronni Fields vs Dana Skotdal / Diana Stroble6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Pappano / Joy Roush vs Celia Evans / Catherine Davidson6-4, 6-3
2026-02-13vs MI-of the Tiger-GregorySplit 22
L#1 DoublesGenevieve Warren / Lana Hansen vs Kitty Flaherty / Heidi Martin3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAika Yoshida vs Emily Peyser3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargot Linde / Jenny Schell vs Kristen Glant / Jeannie Pae4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonni Fields / Lisa Colter vs Janice Levesque Bishop / Jacquie Hartmann6-4, 7-6
2026-02-01vs NWW-AYTC-KadoshimaWon 30
W#1 DoublesGenevieve Warren / Lana Hansen vs Sara Addicott / Lisa Mckenny6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFootie Davis / Jenny Schell vs Sally Ferrin / Monika Dalkin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMargot Linde / Amy Cooley vs Kris Kadoshima / Kim Kobata6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-24vs TCSP-McCoySplit 22
W#1 DoublesLana Hansen / Genevieve Warren vs Mary Ogborn / Kimberly Burton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarol Lelivelt vs Jennifer Zell0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Cooley / Margot Linde vs Stefanie Lynch / Janie DiMartino6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Schell / Joanna Bengford vs Kimberly Sahlin / Staci Foster6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-01-10vs NWW-AYTC-KadoshimaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLana Hansen / Genevieve Warren vs Sara Addicott / Lisa Mckenny5-7, 6-6
L#1 SinglesLori Aagard vs Carmen Zlateff4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Schell / Footie Davis vs Anna Deliganis / Monika Dalkin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargot Linde / Amy Cooley vs Gail Domingos / Yoshimi Pelczarski6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Lana Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.84
Margot Linde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Footie Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Jenny Schell
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.80
Genevieve Warren
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.77
Lisa Colter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Lelivelt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Lori Aagard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Amy Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Aika Yoshida
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Joanna Bengford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Laura Pappano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Beth Hom
published 4
3.59
Mei McRae
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Joy Roush
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Ronni Fields
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Jennifer Kalman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Schell + Amy Cooley8459% games+6.1% vs expected
Joy Roush + Beth Hom4551% games+4.2% vs expected
Lisa Colter + Ronni Fields6258% games+3.5% vs expected
Genevieve Warren + Lana Hansen15656% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Colter + Lori Aagard5457% games−0.6% vs expected
Jenny Schell + Footie Davis13956% games−1.4% vs expected
Margot Linde + Amy Cooley9054% games−2.6% vs expected
Lisa Colter + Joanna Bengford3250% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lana Hansen
129W–56L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Margot Linde
58W–12L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Footie Davis
34W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Jenny Schell
45W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Genevieve Warren
102W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Lisa Colter
27W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carol Lelivelt
67W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Lori Aagard
49W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Cooley
39W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Aika Yoshida
37W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Joanna Bengford
95W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Laura Pappano
26W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Beth Hom
28W–41L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Mei McRae
76W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Joy Roush
26W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ronni Fields
38W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Jennifer Kalman
56W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.