← Search

Lisa Colter

Snohomish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Snohomish · 4.0
2 of 8
WA · 4.0
293 of 782

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lisa has gone from the 60th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 32.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
W
Nicole Ung / Justine Bang
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Aagard
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Aagard
+0.015better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Caroline Johnson / Theresa Maloney
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Kalman
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Schell
+0.019better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Roush
−0.051below expectation — took 43% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronni Fields
+0.046better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronni Fields
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Amy Hsu / Jason Hsumixed
2025-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Wurden
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Choi
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Aagard
+0.011better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Aagard
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Suk
−0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 5-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.