← Search

Lori Aagard

Mill Creek, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 49W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Aagard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-05-17 · CP-Wanderers-Hansen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Colter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · CP-Wanderers-Hansen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Colter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · CP-Wanderers-Hansen · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · CP-McRae · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Kalman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · CP-McRae · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-01-10 · CP-McRae · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-14 · CP-W 55 7.0-Czerwinski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-24 · CP-W 55 7.0-Czerwinski · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Grobstok
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-19 · CP-W 55 7.0-Czerwinski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-01 · CP-NightClub-McRae · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Colter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-17 · CP-NightClub-McRae · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Colter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-01 · CP-Unleashed-McRae · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
54.1%
33W–28L · 49.9% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.3% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
14%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe