← Search

Cecilia Moens

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 52W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Moens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-18 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Sherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Sherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darrin Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-03-01 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-13 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-24 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laine Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laine Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-05 · NTC-The Vicious Fishes-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
44.8%
39W–48L · 47.1% of games
7.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#1 Singles
31%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe