← Search

Kim Scott

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 41W–53L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kim Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-09-11 · NTC-Net Assets-Beaudoin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Ringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Walther
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stroble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Spade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
L
2026-03-29 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Borgonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-20 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-24 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-10 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Sandoval
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · NTC-Net Assets-Ellison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.8% of games
3.5
32.7%
18W–37L · 42.3% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.9% of games
7.0
40%
8W–12L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer