← Search

Caitlin Hennessy

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 61W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Hennessy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Hennessy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-08-06 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Hennessy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1
L
2026-07-26 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Hennessy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · JTC-Pinyerd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · JTC-Pinyerd · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shyla Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 62% of games
3.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 59.2% of games
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 55.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
3.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert