← Search

Alexa Licata

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 108W–52L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alexa Licata to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-09-06 · Licata summer26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Melissa Vollmer
2026-08-16 · Licata summer26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · MC-Shooting Stars-Kim · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · MC-Shooting Stars-Kim · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · MC-Shooting Stars-Kim · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · Licata_3.5_flex · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · ETC-Game, Set, Laugh-Swiftney · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · ETC-Game, Set, Laugh-Swiftney · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 75.7% of games
3.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 73.7% of games
3.5
68%
51W–24L · 58.4% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 71% of the time
#1 Singles
71%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer