← Search

Lindsay Terpstra

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 37W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lindsay Terpstra to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Wang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Walsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Joe Chapin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Walsh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Walsh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Walsh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Newbees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Podlusky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Walsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2026-07-19 · NWW-WSC-Wang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Shinn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · Newbees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shan Zhu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
W
2026-07-14 · Newbees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Podlusky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.1% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 69.4% of games
0.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer