Search

Steve Lin

Medina, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 44W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
634 of 755

Steve is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Steve has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Steve has gone from the 52nd to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
34W–34L · 52.5% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 24% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
L
Jason Shinn / Lindsay Terpstramixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Lin
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brook Koski
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Lik Wong / Corey Klein
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gil White
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
MIke Wood / Gavin Curtis
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shan Park
+0.068better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jeremy Newton-Smith / Mac Pinski
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Kroese
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Ticson MacH / Darren Carrido
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Kroese
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Scott Miller / Richard Seges
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Fowler
0.034below expectation — took 28% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
PORTER STROBLE / Ian Davis
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Fowler
0.040below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Eddy Ferre / Yogesh Bedwal
2026-01-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shan Park
0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Mac Pinski / Michael Gauthier
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gary Fowler
0.063below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Lois James / Thomas Barbanomixed
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erin Corson
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Xin Cheng / XIAOOU ZHUANGmixed
2025-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Chattin
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.