← Search

Brook Koski

ISSAQUAH, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 66W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brook Koski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-08-08 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thane Liffick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · EDG-Wood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Rhim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Strand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · EDG-Wood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Ellen Jones / Michael Ford
2026-07-12 · EDG-Wood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Rhim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Strand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · EDG-Brennock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Rochford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lainie Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 48.9% of games
3.5
27.1%
16W–43L · 41.5% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.4% of games
7.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.4% of games
6.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
34.5%
10W–19L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer