Search

Haley Neff-LaFord

Bothell, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 31W–52L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.0
17 of 18
WA · 3.0
878 of 960

Haley is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Haley has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Haley has gone from the 7th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.2% of games
3.0
26.1%
12W–34L · 38.3% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
Yuri McClinton / Ying Yan
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shweta Bhat
+0.026better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Amy Enns-Ford / Kristan Weller
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Tsutsumoto
0.024below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Heather Bauer / Lisa Mihm
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan van Meter
0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Huixin Lai / Lizzy Feng
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Strelow / Renee Sedghinasab
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.017better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Super Sandy / Krystle Peeters
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shweta Bhat
0.072below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Lisa Adamek / Stephanie Hill
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Skylar Sherwood / Denise Thomas
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Akiko Koyama
0.020below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Simmonds
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Tsutsumoto
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Julia Roast / Meghan Bradner
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Besel
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.