Search

Lizzy Feng

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 24W–28L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
98 of 137
WA · 3.0
1147 of 1529

Lizzy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lizzy has been 3.0 for all 2 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
80%
12W–3L · 63.8% of games
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 50.7% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huixin Lai
+0.015better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Iris Cai
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-6
W
Rainie McLaughlin / Kelly Ambrose
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Lu
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Lu
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huixin Lai
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Lu
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Lu
+0.013better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Hannah Kim / Justine Lin
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huixin Lai
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.044below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Roxana Rautu / Bianca Druta
2026-03-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Ning Zhang
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-5
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.