← Search

Debra Simmonds

Redmond, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
163 matches · 34W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Simmonds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-05-31 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Stapleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Besel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Tsutsumoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · RBW-Howe Nice · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nikki Juhlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · RTC-Koyama · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shweta Bhat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-20 · RBW-Howe Nice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nikki Juhlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · RTC-Koyama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Akiko Koyama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · RTC-Koyama · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Stapleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-28 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Stapleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · RTC-Simmonds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Stapleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · RTC-Simmonds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Neff-LaFord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 42.9% of games
3.0
17.9%
14W–64L · 36.8% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
27.9%
12W–31L · 42.9% of games
7.0
8.7%
2W–21L · 33.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal