Search

Debbie Schrock

Snohomish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
244 matches · 129W–115L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
71%
stay 3.0
29%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
326 of 755

Debbie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debbie has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Debbie has gone from the 24th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.1% of games
3.0
45.2%
42W–51L · 49.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60.6%
43W–28L · 53.3% of games
6.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history244 matches
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Shively
+0.019better than expected — took 72% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Nelson
0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Audrey Watanabe / Mary Ann Iwanski
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jude Neldam
+0.002better than expected — took 68% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Julie Martin / Naomi O'Learychamps
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jill LaRosa
+0.013about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Shively
+0.024better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Sandra Stark / Ellen Yoon
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Sally Linebarger / MaryAnn O'Connell
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
0.031below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
+0.008better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Felicia Ng / Lily Ng
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Nelson
0.073below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Debra Simmonds / Nikki Juhlin
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Shively
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Diane Lee / Jane O'Brien
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Shively
0.015about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.