← Search

Debbie Schrock

Snohomish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 131W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Schrock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
W
2026-08-07 · FC-Senioritas-Neldam · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Homa Assefi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · FC-Senioritas-Neldam · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · FC-Senioritas-Neldam · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · FC-Senioritas-Neldam · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · FC-Senioritas-Neldam · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jude Neldam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jill LaRosa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · MC-W 3.0-Turner · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · NWW-FC-Pinkerton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · MC-W 3.0-Turner · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.6% of games
3.0
45.2%
42W–51L · 49.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60.6%
43W–28L · 53.3% of games
6.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe