Search

Donna Lou

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
109 matches · 57W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
85%
stay 3.0
15%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
91 of 144
WA · 3.0
399 of 755

Donna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Donna has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Donna has gone from the 36th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games
3.0
40%
22W–33L · 46.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
6.0
75%
21W–7L · 57.8% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
W
Diane Erickson / Jill Snyder
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Tucker
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Susan James / Maurene Cronyn
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Cross
+0.065better than expected — took 92% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosemary Curran
+0.031better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jaclyn Zevenbergen / Sarah Larson
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Saddler
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Nancy Edwards / Nikki Juhlin
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sonya Teele
0.052below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Helen Jiang / Indu Basavaiah
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jillayna Campos
+0.032better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Shannon Hull / Christine Morgan
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Bodine
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Eden Goldbloom / Christy Chang
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Young
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Telsin Brower
0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jen Waldher / Lindsey McCallum
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Bodine
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sanders
0.008about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura VanBeek
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.