← Search

Barb Bodine

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 31W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Barb Bodine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-01 · TCSP-Grass Kickers-Campos/Choder · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Puckett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · TCSP-Grass Kickers-Campos/Choder · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Choder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · Bodine (flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
W
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-19 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-06 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · Bodine (flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-25 · Bodine (flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-01 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · Bodine (flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-03 · Bodine (flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 50.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.4% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Singles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe