Search

Jen Waldher

Clyde Hill, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
54 matches · 41W–13L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
15%
stay 3.0
85%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 60% stay · 40% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Clyde Hill · 3.0
1 of 7
WA · 3.0
146 of 1107

Jen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jen has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jen has gone from the 40th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.4% of games
3.0
75%
30W–10L · 59.6% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
W
Chandai Josephy / Rachael Carbary
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Wenger
+0.010better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Myhrvold
0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Andrews / Michelle Summers
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
+0.079better than expected — took 75% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Carol Guattare / Joanna Hennessy
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
+0.015better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
+0.052better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
+0.023better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Donna Lou / Barb Bodine
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Tonya Dressel / Amy Bryant
2026-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jaquet
0.017below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Cathy Hollar / Kathy Wang
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Braza
+0.025better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Ann Bowden / Jennifer Grimes
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jaquet
0.026below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 67% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.