← Search

Jen Waldher

Clyde Hill, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 43W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jen Waldher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-06-02 · BC-Bloch · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Wenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Myhrvold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · BC-Court Jesters-Staddon/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-24 · BC-Bloch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jaquet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · BC-Bloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Braza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-18 · BC-Bloch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jaquet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · BTA-Mixed Signals-Gerard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · BTA-Mixed Signals-Gerard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 52.1% of games
3.0
75%
30W–10L · 59.6% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams