← Search

Hwashing Heyworth

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 68W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hwashing Heyworth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-08-05 · KA$H · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · KA$H · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · KA$H · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Volk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-01-03 · NTC-Team Swoop-Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 60.6% of games
3.5
46.3%
25W–29L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
11%
14 matches
#2 Singles
11%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams