← Search

Amy Tonkin

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
111 matches · 61W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
201 of 256
WA · 3.5
890 of 1209

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amy has gone from the 10th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 59% of games
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 50.6% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
W
Marell Morel / Angelyn Regala
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Christina Hua / Susan Kim
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
−0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
−0.001about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Lowe
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
−0.068below expectation — took 8% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Kathrin Jackson / Sarah Zuberec
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaycee Barrett
+0.021better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Mary Fitzgerald / J Weed
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
+0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Molly Black / Jodi Merrywell
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Frol
−0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Rebecca Feyerick / Stephanie Gauthier
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Watts
−0.029below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Cara Perla / Marcia Hood
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Madalena McAllen / Ana Reyes
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
−0.016below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Katherine Markert / Linda Cowin
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth LINDLEY
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.