Search

Heidi Lowe

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
56 matches · 16W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
115 of 256
WA · 3.5
486 of 1209

Heidi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heidi has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Heidi has gone from the 6th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
4.0
21.2%
7W–26L · 39.2% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
Becky Jhu / Stephanie Joss
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
0.043below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Susan Armstrong / Kelly Thayer
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethlyn Whitney
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Alison Gardner / Gaela Prince
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethlyn Whitney
+0.036better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Cynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elina Hartkopf
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Kelly Thayer / Eveline Wunder
2026-01-17 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Ho
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Alexandra Falk / Sabrina Jardine
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy O'Leary
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Esther Juan / Darleen Ornellas
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy O'Leary
+0.059better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Kay Almer / Laura Pilkington
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.037better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shirley Chow
+0.016about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zan Henn
+0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.