← Search

Willemijn de Clercq

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 60W–42L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Willemijn de Clercq to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-09-11 · STC-Better With Age-Czeisler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Czeisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Odom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-11 · STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-03 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-01-25 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Seifred
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.9% of games
3.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 59.1% of games
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.1% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe